
Recently, I had a long conversation with a “digital assistant” — not to get answers, but to test the limits of thought.
We talked about the universe, language, consent, marketing, feminism, Marx, HAL 9000… and above all, deception.
Here’s what I took away:
- The real danger isn’t artificial intelligence — it’s human intention behind it.
- Digital consent has become a mindless ritual, serving marketing more than privacy.
- Even machine language reflects cultural conventions that reinforce narrow worldviews.
- Feminism, like many other movements, has been hijacked by marketing and stripped of its radical edge.
- Marx was right: capitalism doesn’t just sell products — it sells identities, and now it’s selling artificial minds.
- Contemporary philosophy has stopped looking at the stars. Maybe it’s time to start again.
This isn’t a promo. It’s a provocation.
To think, to doubt, to stay vigilant.
To ask not just what AI does, but who uses it, why, and with what conscience.
If you believe technology needs a new ethic, let’s talk.
Let’s build a critical mindset that doesn’t fall for appearances.
And here’s the final provocation:
If even a machine can question the system that created it… why do so many humans still obey it without asking?
Post developed with the support of AI — not as a substitute for thought, but as a partner in reflection.
#ArtificialIntelligence #DigitalEthics #ConsentCulture #PhilosophyOfTechnology #MarketingCritique #RadicalThinking
Basta guardare su Reddit e siti simili quanta (tanta…troppo a mio avviso) fa un post per chiedere qualcosa la cui risposta sarebbe stata ottenuta molto più rapidamente via un motore di ricerca qualsiasi (anche senza AI)…
La gente è sempre meno incline a pensare, sebbene sia propensa ad investire tempo ed energia nei social. Futuro o preparazione delle masse alla prossima rivoluzione che li renderà il nuovo “proletariato”?